What Are the Important Details in Wing Tsun?
- Sifu Alex Richter
- 4 hours ago
- 3 min read

Every month, I host a live Theory and Q&A class via Zoom on the first Saturday. This class offers participants from around the globe the opportunity to ask me anything about Wing Tsun, particularly focusing on theory, techniques, and training issues. I kick off each session with a 10-15 minute discussion on a preselected topic to get the conversation flowing, followed by a wide range of questions from the audience.
I genuinely look forward to these monthly classes, as they highlight topics that may need more attention in Wing Tsun, allowing me to adjust my instruction and programs accordingly. The monthly subscription is incredibly affordable—just $12.99 a month. This gives you access to the live class and recordings from nearly four years of sessions.
In December 2025, I addressed a topic that has been on my mind lately with my senior students: the vital details in Wing Tsun and whether all aspects of the art are equally relevant for application. Anyone who has practiced Wing Chun for a while knows that both big and small details often spark lively debates. Here’s a brief overview of what we've discussed.
Key Areas of Debate
Within the various lineages of Yip Man Wing Chun (Ving Tsun, Wing Tsun, etc.), differences in stance work often lead to the most intense discussions. Exact weight distribution, foot and knee positions, and body posture can vary significantly between factions. This raises questions about the importance of these details—are they even given due attention? For every debate I've witnessed about footwork among Wing Chun lineages, I've noticed many schools that hardly focus on these specifics, often providing minimal instruction like, “stand like this,” then leaving students to figure the rest out themselves.
Other points of contention include the precise position of the fist and wrist during punches, the degree of waist rotation, the necessity of staying “square,” and whether we should prioritize flanking an opponent or advancing straight in (which is often a false dichotomy). These ongoing debates leave us wondering which details are crucial for effectiveness in combat versus those that are merely stylistic preferences.
The Bigger Picture
Ultimately, does it matter if we turn one foot at a time or both at once? In my recent class, I emphasized that the focus should always be on effectiveness, with style points taking a backseat. As my former teacher, Sifu Leung Ting, often said, “Who cares how traditional your techniques are if you get beaten up?” This perspective helps us strike a balance between honing real-world skills and appreciating the artistic aspects of the art. While I find the artistic side of Wing Tsun fascinating, it’s essential that practical self-defense remains a core part of the training.
To distill the essential details for practicality, we must focus on the root concepts. In the debate over whether to shift one foot or both, I argue that moving your center out of the way of an attack should be the priority. Since our opponent will aim for our center (the body), it's crucial to evade their attack and find the best angle to counter. This concept, often referred to as “making the opponent miss the noon line,” is paramount. The method used to achieve this and the specific details involved are secondary to the goal of evading the opponent's attacks.
If Wing Tsun is taught with an emphasis on relevant concepts and underlying principles, we can view technical details as extensions of these principles rather than replacements. For instance, one might execute a perfectly precise “Wing Tsun turn” in the Chum Kiu form, but if that turn isn’t utilized to evade an attack in real time, all that technical beauty becomes irrelevant. This principle applies to every aspect of execution in Wing Tsun.
Continuous Reflection
It’s essential to continually ask yourself, “What am I actually trying to do here?” The answer to that question should guide which details to follow, not the other way around. Don't get me wrong - I'm a stickler for details as I feel that anything worth doing is worth doing to the best of one's abilities. At the same time I feel that effectiveness and the key ideas to achieve this must be paramount.
To join my monthly Theory and Q&A class, click here.
